Not Less than Legal Definition

The case on which Stacey wrote shows us that nothing less than and its variants make no sense to say a prohibition: the suggestion that the ban could apply beyond the specified number of units of time makes no sense. Well, the same problem applies if you use no less than and its variants when specifying a commitment. “No less than” is technically grammatically incorrect “At least 5” makes me think the event occurred approximately at 5, so I left the impression not too much more than 5 I also wanted to add “no less than 5; gives the impression that it has happened 5 times, if not more, and makes you think of a (jury) “if not more… » . provided that (1) such new leases cover properties located in the designated area and geological depths covering all target areas to be replaced and having a paid primary term of at least one (1) year. Thereafter, this Agreement will be renewed for three (3) consecutive periods, provided that the Owner and Manager agree to such renewal at least one (1) year prior to the end of the current period. Burgers should not contain less than 50% meat. Whether the condition is met does not require a continuing commitment. Instead, the question arises as to whether, at any given time, the duration of what it is reached or exceeds the specified minimum. So, in this context, nothing less than and its variants work well.

“No less than” is not commonly used outside of legal writing, so there are no familiar interpretations to obscure the meaning. Instances of no smaller than and their variants fall into two categories. First, they are used to indicate the duration of an obligation or prohibition. (In other words, the length of an obligation to do or not to do something.) And second, they are used to indicate how long it takes to meet a condition. A common use of this term in the United States is a legal agreement called a “foreclosure act.” This is used when a borrower`s property is threatened with foreclosure. The borrower and the mortgage holder sign a contract to transfer ownership instead of allowing foreclosure. In this way, the borrower prevents his creditworthiness from being damaged as much as would have been the case with foreclosure. When this happens, the borrower is sometimes able to get better terms than with foreclosure, such as when the mortgage holder cancels any debt that is not covered by the value of the property. Mortgage holders are motivated to do this because they save money on legal fees, and these transfers are usually processed faster than foreclosure. The dispute concerned a non-competition clause between a dance studio and Marik, one of its employees. The non-competitive undertaking stated that Marik would not engage in similar business “for a period of at least five (5) years” and would not recruit teachers or students “for a period of at least three (3) years.” The parties disagreed on whether this wording meant “five years” and “three years” or whether it meant that the non-compete obligation could extend beyond five and three years. These are two different expressions used for two different circumstances.

Lawyers use “no less than” because it is grammatically correct. Exports have increased by as much as 80% in the last decade. Here are some examples that use nothing less than specifying the duration required to satisfy a condition: An “arbitrator” is any person appointed by or on behalf of either party or appointed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and: (i) . a licensed commercial real estate agent with at least 15 years of experience representing owners and/or tenants in leasing high-tech or life science spaces in the greater Raleigh/Durham area. Almost every word a lawyer says comes from case law or legislation, and that varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and region to region. I bet that regardless of the jurisdiction or area you are talking about, there is a law or a case where “no less than” is used in a particular context, and that has prevailed. n.1) Payment or money. (2) As an essential element of contract law, consideration is an advantage that must be negotiated between the parties and is the essential reason for the conclusion of a contract by a party. The consideration must have value (at least for the parties) and is exchanged for performance or promise of performance by the other party (this performance itself is consideration). In a contract, a consideration (given thing) is exchanged for another consideration. Not doing an action (abstaining) can be a consideration, for example: “I`m going to pay you $1,000 not to build a road next to my fence.” Sometimes the consideration is “nominal,” meaning it is only indicated for the form, such as “$10 in exchange for transfer of ownership,” which is used to hide the actual amount paid. Contracts may become unenforceable or cancelled (cancelled) for “non-compliance” if it is determined that the intended consideration is worth less than expected, damaged or destroyed, or that the service is not properly performed (e.g., if the mechanic does not operate the car properly).

Acts that are so unlawful or immoral as to be contrary to established public policy may not be used as a counterpart to enforceable contracts. Examples: prostitution, gambling, where prohibited, hiring someone to break a skater`s knee or getting someone to break an agreement (getting someone to withdraw from a promise). If you provide context, I could answer in more detail; Personally, I would almost never use “anything less than” in any context. If I have a certain number, I will clarify it. If we are talking about a contracts of requirements or a contract of expenditures, I would be much more specific than “not less than” or “at least”. When negotiating a contract, the seller has the assurance that the value of the property will not be less than the proposed value and estimates that will be presented later. Depending on changes to the property, the NLT value may be higher or lower. So, to summarize: in the language of obligation or prohibition, use no less than and its variants to specify units of time.

But when you specify the length of time required to fulfill a condition, you feel free to use no less than and its variants. The Company will retain copies of all such contracts, agreements, invoices, invoices and purchase orders for a period of at least six (6) years from the date. The legal definition “instead of” is “in place of” or “in place of”. It is commonly used in legal documents in the United States.3 min spent reading Instead, the undertaking should only apply for six years. Of course, if the company wants to keep the records longer, they are free to do so. Lawyers like to use the avocado style in their wording, regardless of clarity and often accuracy. And guess what: using no more than in terms of time requires a different analysis. And the use of references no less than in time also requires a different analysis. I bet you can`t wait for this blog post.

High school English teachers keep trying to do this thing (if you study English linguistics and understand how counted and uncounted names work, this made-up rule seems pretty stupid).